China belongs in any serious conversation about AI’s future. Start with named institutions and evidence, not a national stereotype.
Competition is about more than a benchmark. The sources below let you compare model development, computing infrastructure, access to markets and influence over governance. They also document cooperation. Neither competition nor a declaration alone tells us how safe future systems will be.
These ten topics also appear in the game and the learning library. The people featured represent different roles: lab founder, researcher, governance scholar and government policymaker. Their presence here does not imply endorsement or a shared position on extinction risk.
China and the US compete over AI, computer chips and how the technology is used. They also have different plans for AI rules.
Neither country has just one view. Companies, researchers and governments can disagree.
AI runs on physical equipment called hardware. Chips do calculations; GPUs do many at once. Data centres house computers, with power and cooling. Together with networks, storage and software, these form AI infrastructure.
Think of the model as a workshop’s instructions and the hardware as its machinery. “Compute” means computing work. Some AI runs on a phone; larger systems often use data centres. Chip export rules can affect access.
Some DeepSeek and Qwen models can be downloaded and changed. That helps people study them, but also lets more people use them.
Being available to download does not automatically make a model safe.
China published an updated AI safety framework in September 2025. It describes risks and ways to manage them.
A published plan is not proof that every protection works.
China and the US both joined the 2023 Bletchley Declaration about AI risks. Countries can compete and still discuss safety.
An agreement is a starting point. What countries do next matters.
Qwen is a family of AI models made by Alibaba Cloud’s team. Its Qwen3 report describes models that others can use and study.
A company’s test results should be checked against other evidence.
Portrait not included: reuse permission not verified.
Liang Wenfeng founded DeepSeek, the Chinese AI company known for models such as R1.
Zhejiang University identifies him as the founder. A founder’s role does not prove a model is safe.
Portrait not included: reuse permission not verified.
Tang Jie is a Tsinghua professor and a co-founder of Zhipu. He has argued for China to build broad AI abilities.
His essay sets out his views. It does not prove what future AI will do.
Portrait not included: reuse permission not verified.
Xue Lan leads Tsinghua’s Institute for AI International Governance. It studies how AI should be managed and works with partners abroad.
Rules, research and cooperation are different parts of AI safety.
Li Qiang is China’s premier. He has called for wider access to AI and cooperation on how it is managed.
His speech shows a public policy position. It is not proof of safety. Role checked September 2026.
English titles and explanations below are editorial summaries, not direct translated quotations. Read company claims, academic work and state policy as distinct sources. Dates describe the cited documents; older releases are not presented as today’s frontier.
DeepSeek · Chinese company announcement · 20 January 2025
The developer presents reasoning results and releases model weights. Benchmark comparisons are company-reported results for that release, not proof of general superiority or safety.
Qwen team / Alibaba Cloud · Chinese company post · April 2025 release
Explains thinking and non-thinking modes and open-weight releases. Use it to discuss deployment choices and licence terms, rather than to infer that every model carrying the Qwen name has identical terms.
Qwen team · Primary technical report · May 2025
Documents the model family and Apache 2.0 release. This is a dated technical example, not a current model ranking.
Cyberspace Administration of China · Chinese official release · 15 September 2025
Describes a technical framework developed under CAC guidance, led by CNCERT with specialist institutions and companies. It updates risk classification and governance measures. Publication is not evidence that all safeguards work.
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs · Chinese government position · 20 October 2023 publication
Advocates development alongside safety, risk testing, international dialogue and discussion of governance through the UN. These are stated government principles, not a quantified scientific risk assessment.
Zhejiang University · Institutional profile · 4 March 2025 displayed date
Identifies alumnus Liang Wenfeng as DeepSeek’s founder. Founding a lab does not make someone a government spokesperson.
Tang Jie · Signed essay hosted by Tsinghua · 12 August 2026 page; original 10 August
Argues for basic research, infrastructure and applications in developing AGI. The author’s aspirations are policy and research arguments, not evidence that AGI has arrived.
Tsinghua-hosted China Education Daily report · March 2026
Identifies Tang Jie as a Tsinghua professor and Zhipu co-founder. This role corroboration is hosted reporting, rather than a corporate register.
Tsinghua I-AIIG · Chinese institutional description · undated; checked 13 September 2026
Names Xue Lan as dean and describes interdisciplinary governance research and international partnerships. Academic analysis should be read separately from government policy.
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs · Official Chinese account · 26 July 2025
Reports the premier calling for wider access, innovation cooperation and joint governance, and proposing a world AI cooperation organisation. A proposal is not evidence of an operational enforcement body.
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs · Official Chinese account · 1 September 2026
Identifies Li Qiang as State Council premier. Used to verify his current role; the site does not adopt the article’s diplomatic assessments as independent findings.
US Bureau of Industry and Security · Official announcement · 13 January 2026
Announced conditional case-by-case review for H200, MI325X and similar chip exports to China. This demonstrates that controls are specific and change over time, rather than a blanket ban on every AI chip.
White House · US government policy plan · July 2025
Sets out priorities for innovation, infrastructure and international leadership/security. A government strategy is an intended direction, not proof of technical leadership or completed implementation.
UK government publication · Joint international declaration · 1 November 2023
Lists China and the United States among participants recognising serious AI risks and the need for cooperation. Agreement on a declaration does not establish compliance or a shared numerical extinction estimate.
KEEP THE CONVERSATION GOING
A learning experience by Beatrix Meszaros, practical AI trainer and keynote speaker.
Contact Beatrix through her website →
For interviews, facilitated sessions or questions about this educational project.